The Garden of Eden

The necessity for believing in six literal days

Ken Ham

The majority of Christians in churches probably aren't sure whether God really created everything in six literal days. Many believe it doesn't matter whether it took six days or six million years. However, it is vital to believe in six literal days for many reasons. Foremost is that allowing these days to be long periods of time uindermines the foundations of the message of the Cross.

WHY DO PEOPLE DOUBT THE DAYS

The major reason why people doubt that the days of creation are 24-hour literal days usually has nothing to do with what the Bible says, but comes from outside influences. For example, many believe that because scientists have supposedly proved the earth to be billions of years old then the days of creation cannot be ordinary days.

If people use Scripture to try to justify that the days of creation are long periods of time, they usually quote passages such as 2 Peter 3:8, “...one day is with the Lord as a thousand years...” Because of this, they think the days could be a thousand years, or perhaps even millions of years. However, if you look at the rest of the verse, it says, “...and a thousand years as one day”. This cancels out their argument! The context of this passage concerns the Second Coming of the Lord Jesus Christ. This particular verse is telling people that with God, waiting a day is like waiting a thousand years, and waiting a thousand years is like waiting a day because God is outside of time - He is not limited by natural processes and time. This has absolutely nothing to do with defining the days of creation. Besides, the word 'day' already exists and has been defined, which is why in 2 Peter it can be compared to a thousand years. There is no reference in this passage to the days of creation.

WHAT DOES 'DAY' MEAN?

The Hebrew word for day in Genesis chapter 1 is the word yom. It is important to understand that almost any word can have two or more meanings, depending on context. We need to understand the context of the usage of this word in Genesis chapter 1.

Respected Hebrew dictionaries, like the Brown, Driver, Briggs lexicon, give a number of meanings for the word yom depending upon context. One of the passages they give for yom's meaning an ordinary day happens to be Genesis chapter 1. The reason is obvious. Every time the word yom is used with a number, or with the phrase 'evening and morning', anywhere in the Old Testament, it always means an ordinary day. In Genesis chapter 1, for each of the six days of creation, the Hebrew word yom is used with a number and the phrase, 'evening and morning'. There is no doubt that the writer is being emphatic that these are ordinary days.

WHAT IF THE DAYS WERE MILLIONS OF YEARS?

The idea of millions of years came from the belief that the fossil record was built up over a long time. As soon as people allow for millions of years, they allow for the fossil record to be millions of years old. This creates an insurmountable problem regarding the Gospel. The fossil record consists of the death of billions of creatures. In fact, it is a record of death, disease, suffering, cruelty, and brutality. It is a very ugly record.

The Bible is adamant though, that death, disease, and suffering came into the world as a result of sin. God instituted death and bloodshed because of sin so man could be redeemed. As soon as Christians allow for death, suffering, and disease before sin, then the whole foundations of the message of the Cross and the Atonement have been destroyed. The doctrine of origin sin, then, is totally undermined.

If there were death, disease, and suffering before Adam rebelled - then what did sin do to the world? What does Paul mean in Romans 8 when he says the whole of creation groans in pain because of the Curse? How can all things be restored in the future to no more death and suffering, unless the beginning was also free of death and suffering? The whole message of the Gospel falls apart if one allows millions of years for the creation of the world.

HOW SHOULD WE APPROACH SCRIPTURE?

One of the major problems we all have (in fact, it is the same problem Adam and Eve had) is that we tend to start from outside God's Word and then go to what God has written in the Bible (or - in Adam's case - what God said directly to him) to try to interpret it on the basis of our own ideas. This is really the major reason why most people question the days of creation.

We need to realize that the Bible is God's Word. And as it is the inspired Word of the infinite Creator, God, then it must be self-authenticating and self-attesting. Thus, we should always start with what God's Word says regardless of outside ideas. Only God's Word is infallible.

If we allow our children to accept the possibility that we can doubt the days of creation when the language speaks so plainly, then we are teaching them a particular approach to all of Scripture. Why shouldn't they then start to doubt that Christ's Virgin Birth really means a virgin birth? Why shouldn't they start to doubt that the Resurrection really means resurrection?

In fact, there are many theologians who doubt these very things, as they have come to disbelieve the plain words of Scripture written in the foundational Book of Genesis.

WHY DID GOD TAKE SIX DAYS?

If you think about it, an infinite Creator God could have created everything in no time. Why, then, did HE take as long as six days? The answer is given in Exodus 20:11. Here we find that God tells us that HE deliberately took six days and rested for one as a pattern for man - this is where the seven-day week comes from. The seven-day week has no basis for existing except from Scripture. If one believes that the days of creation are long periods of time, then the week becomes meaningless.?

The Bible tells us that Adam was created on the sixth day. If he lived through day six and day seven, and then died when he was 930 years old, and if each of these days was a thousand or a million years, you have major problems! On the fourth day of creation (Genesis 1:14-19), we are given the comparison of day to night, and days to years. If the word 'day' doesn't mean an ordinary day, then the comparison of day to night and day to years becomes meaningless.

Were the days 24 hours? Most definitely! 'Let God be true, but every man a liar' (Romans 3:4).

I was recently asked by a pastor to be on his radio talk show to discuss dinosaurs and the Bible. Let me tell you what happened.

When I contacted the studio, I quickly found out that I had really been ambushed by two ministers, George and Pete, who were ardent evolutionists. They called their broadcast The George and Pete Show. (By the way, there are some conservative pastors in their denomination who are creationists, but these two certainly were not!)

Because this was a secular radio station, I was saddened to realize that I now faced a battle with two ministers before a largely secular audience. I prayed that the people listening would see the foolishness of clergy who compromise their faith by accepting evolution.

To give you an idea of how difficult it is to communicate with liberal pastors (who have been indoctrinated by their colleges and seminaries to accept evolution and reject Genesis), I would like to summarize part of our on-air conversation. It went something like this:

Questioning George, I asked, 'George, because you accept evolution and millions of years for Earth's history, then you must also accept that there were animals living and dying for millions of years before man came on the scene — correct?'

'Correct,' replied George.

I then responded, 'But doesn't the Bible teach that death only came into the world after Adam, the first man who sinned?'

'Yes,' replied George, 'That is what God intended us to believe.' (Notice the word 'intended'. This is a key to understanding how some liberal pastors think.)

'But can't you see the conflict? Evolution teaches death before man — the Bible teaches that death came after man,' I responded.

'No,' said George and Pete, 'There's no conflict there!'

Every time I pointed out contradictions between evolution and the Bible, they replied that there were none because what we read in Genesis is what God 'intended' us to believe. I countered with the Biblical doctrine of marriage, and read Matthew 19 to them, showing that Jesus, who is the Truth and wouldn't lie, quoted directly from Genesis to build the doctrine of marriage.

They then went on to say that Jesus was quoting what God 'intended' us to believe. Even though (according to them), man wasn't made from dust because he evolved, Jesus wasn't telling a lie, because he quoted what God 'intended' us to believe!

George and Pete declared that evolution told us the true history of the world, yet Genesis was true too! According to them, even though Genesis isn't literal history, it is what God intended us to believe. It is history — yet it isn't!

I just prayed that the audience, probably somewhat confused at this point, could see the foolishness of their position. It also shows clearly what we are up against in this nation. The more we see ministers like George and Pete coming out of seminaries, the more we will see churches confused about what Christianity is all about.

Sadly, from our experience, the majority of seminaries are training 'Georges and Petes' all over the world. This is why we say that a major part of our ministry is to evangelize the Church!

WAS THERE DEATH, PAIN, AND SUFFERING BEFORE ADAM AND EVE'S SIN?

At the close of the Creation Week, God called everything He had made 'very good'. This is powerful evidence against the idea that long ages of suffering and dying took place before the first man and woman, Adam and Eve, appeared.